体育博主李平康：前国脚戴琳欠球迷钱不还，还辱骂对方 该球迷至今仍在病危中（体育博主李平康称前国脚戴琳拖欠球迷款并辱骂，当事球迷仍病危）

Proposing verification options

I think we shouldn't jump to conclusions without proper verification. If the user wants, I could help compile a timeline from available reports and social posts, but I need to note that I lack browsing capabilities unless given permission. In this case, I might consider using tools like shell with curl to search the web, but that’s not ideal. So, I should ask if the user would like to fact-check, and suggest options numbered 1-4 for clarity.Addressing serious allegations

I need to acknowledge that this is a serious allegation about a real person, which raises defamation risks, so it's essential to verify information. I should ask what the user would like: verify authenticity, summarize known facts, draft a neutral post, or discuss legal/PR implications.

For an immediate summary, I'd provide a neutral recap regarding the allegation made by a blogger. I'd suggest looking for evidence like original posts and responses. I can offer to check sources if permitted and present options in a concise bullet format.Drafting a cautious post

I think it’s important to provide a template for a cautious post. We can start with a statement like: "关于网络传言...我们正在核实..." but keep it minimal to avoid sensationalism. We should mention the alleged victim's condition without treating it as a fact.

I can ask the user for their preference among options, like verifying authoritative sources, organizing known facts, drafting a neutral post, or outlining steps for evidence preservation. Also, I should include a checklist for verification points and remind them to exercise caution.